Mr Brooks

Posted In: Mr. Personality

Ralph Roussos says...

If it hadn't been for the dumbest cop ever born (the one played by Demi Moore), this would have gotten one more star.

Anyway, Costner does a marvelous job as a tormented serial killer addicted to thrill killing while also holding down a great job and doting on his wife and daughter.The daughter, however, may be a budding serial killer herself, and he wants to save her from becoming like her father.

William Hurt also is in full creepy mode as a manifestation of Costner's dueling personality, while comedian Dane Cook plays a would-be killer who wants Costner to tutor him in how to do it and not get caught.

There is some intrusive techno music and a Matrix-like hallway shoot-out that could have been done better.However, these are quibbles.I had a bigger problem with Moore's distracting divorce battle, impulsiveness, and general arrogance.

Posted on September 6, 2011

Brook Bunda says...

The scene is now a film staple; tormented souls in a circle, seated on uncomfortable folding chairs - a 12-step meeting.Earl Brooks, Costner, recently named Portland's "Man Of The Year," stands up and announces that he is an addict.Moments later, having wandered away for some coffee, he is confronted by his visible/invisible alter ego Marshall, William Hurt, who says, "You are such a hypocrite, why don't you just tell them you killed two people last night and it felt great?"



Mr. Brooks is a smart, dressy, psychological crime drama that is well cast, written, and acted.The picture holds your interest by successfully walking the fine line between implausibility and creepiness.Remember Marg Helgenberger, KC in the underappreciated TV show, China Beach?As Mrs. Brooks she seems blissfully disinterested in her husband's implausibly explained absences.As to Mr. Brooks himself, he models knowledge of tradecraft a world-class assassin would admire, the attention to detail, thoroughness, and commitment to excellence are inspiring.But behind this buttoned-up methodology lurks real passion; after the film's first murder he's consumed by waves of euphoria, endorphins flood - the stuff of addiction.



The film's most interesting dynamic is between the warring angels of Mr. Brooks himself; played out in conversations between Costner and Hurt.Costner has remorse and truly wants to stop, Hurt is all id, gleefully celebrating and encouraging the dark hunger.While these two argue, they are also chummy and good-natured, frequently cracking each other up - after all, they've been close friends for a long time.Casting plays a large role is the success of this relationship.Costner, long known for leaving in the hangers when putting on shirts, presents a lacquered façade that works perfectly here, hiding the turmoil within.Hurt, who has adopted "less is more" as his personal mantra, is ideally suited to the task of embodying something less than human but more than marsh gas.



The second act is a little clogged, one backstory too many.The voyeur that witnessed Brooks in action wants to piggyback for kicks.The Detective, Demi Moore, who's been tracking the "Thumbprint Killer" for years, is going through a nightmarish divorce.Two psychotic killers, sworn to vengeance against her, wander on and off the set.However, divergence makes way for razor sharp convergence in act 3.



The dichotomy torturing Mr. Brooks is ultimately resolved at home.He is a devoted husband and loving father.But what if he has passed along his broken, twisted genes; what would it mean to love and care for a murderer?He sees himself in his daughter; does she see herself in him?In the final scene of this movie, I found myself rooting for Mr. Brooks - despite everything I'd seen him do.That is the truest measure of the picture's success.A film like this would normally be presented through the eyes of Detective Atwood, Moore, this was much more intriguing.Highly recommended.

Posted on September 7, 2011

Normand Mcclane says...

"Mr. Brooks" presents us with fascinating dualities, which in turn shows a depth and complexity that's rarely seen in films about serial killers. For cardboard tycoon Earl Brooks (Kevin Costner), there's a duality between his everyday life and his secret life as the Thumbprint Killer: the former is picture perfect, a wealthy man with a loving wife and daughter; the latter is an unfeeling monster who readily admits that he's addicted to murdering. I initially thought that I was supposed to choose a version of this man to root for. I eventually came to the realization that making this choice would be pointless. I say this because this story is not meant to instill sympathy or even hatred; it merely wants to show Mr. Brooks for who he is, in both good and bad ways. This is very appropriate because, when you get right down to it, there's very little about this man to emotionally invest in.



The biggest duality is between Brooks' rational state of mind and his deep-seeded, animalistic urges. His murderous tendencies very cleverly manifest themselves as a man named Marshall (William Hurt), who can only be seen and heard by Brooks. Marshall acts as a driving force, temping Brooks simply because murdering is so much fun. The dynamic between these two characters is incredibly unique, especially since one is nothing more than the other's subconscious mind. In a sense, Marshall is the true serial killer; Brooks is merely a tool, a physical means to commit murder. It's obvious that, at times, Brooks is purposely not trying hard enough to control Marshall--taking a life is just so intoxicating.



At other times, Brooks genuinely tries like hell to fight against his urges; on some level, he knows that what he's doing is wrong. At the film's start, we learn that he had managed to avoid temptation for two years, and by then, the possibility of relapsing seemed remote. But then he learns of a young couple attending a dance school, and the urge proves too strong to fight off. With the extreme precision of a master calculator, he's able to break into their apartment and shoot them as they make love. As an extra thrill, he poses their bodies and photographs them. His final touch--his trademark--is to press each victim's thumb into a bloodstain, leaving behind a print.



If only Brooks had noticed that the couple left their bedroom drapes open. His carelessness comes back to haunt him in the form of a young voyeur only known as Mr. Smith (Dane Cook). He presents Brooks with incriminating photos; the couple's apartment complex is within range of Smith's camera, and apparently, he had been photographing them for months (they always had sex with their drapes open). But Smith is not interested in turning Brooks in; rather, he wants to join Brooks during his next murder spree. There's a restrained intensity to this character that I really liked, suggestive of an immature teenager desperate to prove himself when he's clearly not ready. Cook played this character brilliantly, giving him just the right mix of arrogance, anger, and naivety. Brooks does agree to Smith's terms, but not before discussing the situation with Marshall. Let's just say that everyone here has a few hidden agendas.



All this paves the way for some interesting scenes of victim hunting. At one point, Brooks describes the process as something similar to falling in love: you come across many people, but only a select few have the ability to make your heart pound with excitement. I must admit, I've never heard it put that way before. I must also admit, I loved it; there's a definite charm to this character that shines through despite the fact that he's a sociopath. This doesn't make him a likeable character by any means, but it certainly makes him a bit more compelling. One wonders if he's capable of feeling any emotion, especially when it comes to his family. Without giving too much away, a subplot involving his college-age daughter (Danielle Panabaker) leads him to question certain things; even after moments of reflection, his feelings remain unclear.



Hot on the Thumbprint Killer's trail is Detective Tracy Atwood (Demi Moore), who's involved in her own subplots: one is about a bitter divorce; the other is about an escaped criminal threatening to track her down. When Brooks is made aware of her, he finds her more fascinating than problematic (the same can't be said for Marshall). Her father is a wealthy businessman, and because of that, she's worth millions. But instead of following in his footsteps, she decided to be a cop. Why is this? Indeed, she is a fascinating character, someone so fragile despite her tough-as-nails appearance. Again, duality comes into play, an ingredient that prevents the film from becoming a run of the mill psychological thriller. Ultimately, every ingredient of "Mr. Brooks" makes for one the most well crafted film of the year.

Posted on September 7, 2011

Fermin Guest says...

***1/2



Bruce A. Evans' "Mr. Brooks" deserves praise for at least bringing a certain degree of freshness to the well-worn serial-killer genre.



Kevin Costner portrays Earl Brooks, a devoted husband and father and the recent recipient of the Man of the Year Award from the city of Portland, Oregon for his work as a successful businessman.He also just happens to be a cold-blooded murderer, known to the media and the law enforcement community as the Fingerprint Killer, so named because he leaves that telltale sign behind at each of his crime scenes (we must assume it is not his own fingerprint, although the script never actually spells that out for us).As the movie opens, Brooks hasn't killed anyone for two years, having chosen to resist the temptation by attending AA meetings and focusing on his wife and daughter.However, lately, Brooks has begun to succumb to the pull of his "addiction," once again allowing his darker angel to lure and goad him into seeking out unsuspecting victims as a means of alleviating the pressure.



What separates "Mr. Brooks" from all other previous serial-killer thrillers is that it has chosen to actually incarnate that bad angel on screen in the form of an unnerving William Hurt, who appears by Brooks' side at strategic moments in the movie to advise, berate and commiserate with Brooks as he contemplates his next homicidal action. Generally, in these movies, we rarely get a sense of the intense mental struggle taking place within the deeply disturbed, psychotic mind of the killer.Through the use of Hurt's character (referred to by Brooks as Marshall), however, the writers, Evans and Raynold Gideon, are able to verbalize that conflict and show us the two warring factions co-existing within this single warped psyche. Despite the absurdity of it, Brooks truly believes that his "condition" can be "cured" if he regularly and faithfully attends a self-help group for alcoholics. Thus, against our better judgment, perhaps, we find ourselves almost feeling sorry for the man, a position one rarely finds oneself in in a tale such as this one.



The complex plot also includes a wannabe young killer (Dane Cook) who blackmails Brooks into taking him out on his next killing spree; an expert homicide investigator (Demi Moore) who was investigating the Fingerprint Killer case until the trail turned cold; and Brooks' own college-aged daughter, Jane (Danielle Panabaker), who may have inherited her dad's killer "gene" and might just possibly have a murder or two of her own to account for.



The storyline may not always pass the credibility threshold (particularly in the suggestion that psychosis might have a genetic component and can be passed down from generation to generation), but the cleverness of the approach and the genuine creepiness of many of the scenes go a long way towards mitigating the imperfections.Moreover, Costner, Hurt, Moore and Cook give spellbinding performances as the killer and the various persons and pseudo-persons caught in the bloody web he has woven.



Working as a team, Costner and Hurt bring complementary opposing qualities to their roles which, when taken together, add up to a single, well-rounded character.In a complex variation on the Jekyll and Hyde, Faust and Mephistopheles dichotomy, Costner conveys the poignancy and vulnerability of the "good" Brooks, while Hurt shows us the steely-eyed cold-heartedness of the "bad" Brooks.Yet, there are times when even those roles switch, as when Costner coldly laughs at the prospect of a victim's potential suffering and Hurt provides words of comfort to a hurting Costner.



Together, the two talented stars create a complex symbiotic relationship that lifts "Mr. Brooks" several rungs above the ordinary.

Posted on September 7, 2011

Sherise Firsching says...

Mr. Brooks has a Man of the Year award, a loving family, some seemingly-mundane hobbies, and a little nickname the papers like to use calling him: "The Thumbprint Killer." Only they don't call HIM the killer; they just refer to some of the handy work he seems to have left behind and this addiction keeps him killing. He doesn't like to do it, mind you, going to AA meetings because he is trying to keep his addiction in check. Still, an addiction is an addiction is an addiction and relapses to occur. His latest relapse, a dancer he sees and her lover, change things when something changes in his pattern.

Namely, a loose end comes to visit and builds a world within his world by asking him to show off what killing is made of.

And that's where things get started.



When I first rented the movie, I didn't expect that much. Costner is oftentimes hit-or-miss and, frankly, I was afraid he would miss in this role. Happily I have to say I was wrong, with Costner making an excellent killer and also kicking it in a dual role. One of the many things Costner showcases in this movie is the way he can play with the mentality within a role - here Mr. Brooks has an imaginary friend we are lucky enough to see and the two of them share laughs and plans and suspicions on what is what. Honestly these are some of the best scenes in the business, making you really like Mr. Brooks and appreciate his humor. Costner does great work making Mr. Brooks a sympathetic character, too, with his murderous life balanced well by a family he sees to really love.



Along the way, we pick up a counterpart to Costner, one Demi Moore, and she does some good work in this venture, too. I was equally surprised by this because I didn't expect to be able to take her seriously in any sort of way as an officer, much less an officer with a plethora of secrets. One of those things is a little bit of a distraction, mind you, one called The Hangman, but that just seems to be a little piece of a giant puzzle trying to keep the audience engaged.

I'm glad the writers at least remembered that Mr. Brooks was the focal point of the tale.



For people wanting some hardcore murder, this is a mainstream piece and doesn't offer up a thick helping of doom. It does have its moments and it does have its beauty, and it should still offer up something to that side of the spectrum. People who don't like graphic horror should be able to keep on keeping on with their watching, able to love Costner and able to watch some death together.

I liked the movie - it had a lot to give to - and think people should check it out.

Posted on September 9, 2011

Angel Orrick says...

I don't know why people gripe about a movie because it didn't live up to their expectations. It's pointless. As an afficionado of psychological thrillers and murder mysteries I found Mr. Brooks to be just about as good as it gets. To me that means there were a couple of plot twists I didn't expect and an ending that leaves you wondering about a thing or two.



Kevin (the-amazing-man-of-cardboard) Costner was at his best as was the rest of the cast, and I found the interaction between Mr. Brooks and Marshall to be pretty creepy. Mr. Brooks isn't all good and his alter-ego isn't all bad. And both are very charming.



William Hurt played Marshall beautifully with a certain creep factor he does so well. Dane Cook was perfect as Mr. Smith, Demi was believable as the rich cop and Marg was.. well.. Marg. She managed to keep the hair-tossing to a minimum. I didn't find anything extraordinary about Danielle Panabaker as the daughter, Jane. She's got a look that's popular right now but otherwise she was just OK.



Altogether, It's one of Kevin Costner's best performances. The scene between Mr. Brooks and Marshall in the kitchen when Costner realizes the truth about his daughter is masterful and makes you actually feel sorry for Mr. Brooks in spite of the fact he's a brutal killer. I highly recommend this as something to be watched with appreciation for the marvelous, if not perfect, movie it is.

Posted on September 9, 2011

Dennise Riesenberg says...

This by far is Kevin Costner's best film he has been in about 15 years. Costner plays "Mr. Brooks" who leads a double life. On the outside he is a successful businessman and loving family man, on the inside, he struggles with his addiction, his addiction to murder. For about two years he has been able to resist until he listens to his alter ego (played devilishly by William Hurt) to play again. He then goes into the apartment of a couple and proceeds to kill both of them.

The next day he is visited by Mr. Smith, who blackmails him to take him to his next killing. All the while he is being followed by a detective trying to solve the "thumb print murders" and juggles his personal life which is thrust into turmoil. His daughter "drops out of school" and is pregnant, but is that all of it? Soon he discovers she shares the same addiction and sickness as he does and out of compassion "fixes" her situation as well as his own predicament. What to do with and about Mr. Smith? Fulfilling his promise to Mr. Smith he takes him on his next job and decides he wants Mr. Smith to end his suffering and make him disappear, but is this the true end of Mr. brooks?

This one will keep you on your toes, on the edge of your seat and guessing until the end. I haven't personally seen a film executed this well in many years, by far the best Costner has done in a decade, and I wish he would do more films of this caliber more often. A great script, cast and great performances played deliciously by both Costner and Hurt. This one is not to be missed, and I promise you won't be disappointed.

Posted on September 9, 2011

Rubie Rockafellow says...

I have longed for an interesting movie about a serial killer with depth since watching Silence of the Lambs in 1991. Its 2007 and I have finally seen that longing fufilled. Only a 16 year wait. Now if only they could make a good vampire movie !



Mr. Brooks was emotionally delicious and satisfying. And the music was perfect for the imagery and the atmosphere, and for whatever else you could want.



I write this empassioned review several months after seeing the film. I still get excited about having seen it every time its mentioned. And I hear there are sequals to be made. How devine ! I hope the Veils are on those soundtracks as well.



This movie lends itself well to :



Dexter ( Showtime series on DVD )

Darkly Dreaming Dexter by Jeff Lindsay ( Book show was based on )

VNV Nation - Testament ( CD that feels emotionally right for the subject )

Posted on September 11, 2011

Erasmo Abdul says...

Wild West Indian fighter? nah.Apocalyptic postman? nah.Lawman nemesis of Al Capone? nah.Quirky anal retentive social icon with an addiction to murdering strangers? RIGHT ON!Kevin Costner is great in this.A very entertaining and Hitchcockesque murder thriller.



Yeah, I read the other reviewer criticisms about "believability".So what?I had some believablity issues with "Gremlins", but my kids wore that one out.



I won't rehash the plot for you, as that's done all over the page here.I just want to throw in my two cents that this is one of the best suspense thrillers that I've seen in a long time.It smelled of high budget, and careful writing, casting, directing, sets, editing, etc.



The only weak spot for me was Demi Moore's detective character.The umpteen millionaire martial arts expert genius icewater in her veins detective.Yuck.(I guess I did have to suspend a little belief on her part).She was a bad idea.But you can work around it and still enjoy the flick.



Most recommended.Not for children.Have fun.

Posted on September 13, 2011

Santana Marciel says...

Please stay out of my neighborhood. If you are looking for entertainment with excellent acting, this movie is for you. Kevin Costner and William Hurt are in their prime in this movie. The content of the movie is about a man obessesed with killing and then finds out he has passed that obessesion down to his daughter. I am apprehensive to say it is a good movie because of the content but as far as acting and drama with suspense...it is a good movie.

Posted on September 14, 2011